(See bottom for some very important dates regarding the City Comprehensive Plan Re-Write and a presentation about the Rio Bosque by John Sproul.)
Imagine that you have a trustee in charge of managing your
financial portfolio. You go to this manager and say that you have decided to
make some changes in your financial plans. The manager tells you that you
can’t. You want “abc”; she insists you want and need “xyz”. As she has done so many times before, she
tells you that her investments for you assure that your fees for her services
are kept low. You tell her that is not true but she keeps insisting that it is.
You’ve noticed that she makes a number of claims that aren’t true. You realize
that your goals and objectives have diverged.
You also realize that your trustee shares very little with you and makes
non-transparency a regular policy. What
do you do? I’ll bet you take your assets out of that account. I bet you fire
your trustee and go get another one.
Overwhelmingly people at the Dover Kohl-led charrette
process involving the Scenic Corridor and the Westside (NW El Paso) Plan said
that they just don’t want to develop any of the acreage in the Westside Plan.
(Read No-Build
IS the Option at our blog.) Nobody
wanted the old plan that many remember was written in spite of objections. Big “X’s” marked that plan at the hands-on
session. “Why sell the land for development?” was the key question. The PSB,
the land manager, our “trustee”, will tell you that selling land will keep
water rates low. From an open records request, we learned that PSB land sales
from 1999 to 2009 were about $4 million per year. For the last two years those
sales amounted to less than $500,000.
Land sales only amounted to 2% of the yearly revenue including water,
stormwater, and wastewater – not enough to keep rates low by any means.
Now factor in some more things. Once land is developed,
guess who takes over the cost to maintain the infrastructure and provide the
services for the new development? You do – and it’s much more than keeping the
pipes working and the sewer flowing. It’s schools, fire, police, roads, more
and more. You can count on paying for these expenses from now on until
eternity.
Except it won’t ever go for very long. There’s an 800-pound
gorilla sitting next to our land manager: water supply. We have more land than
we have water. Development doesn’t pay for itself. We are in fact subsidizing
developers. Costs for water will increase as we depend more and more on
desalinization and imported water. (By the way, imported water from farmland to
the east of El Paso County is not at all a sure bet. Word is that there are
lawsuits popping up.)
Land sales may have made some difference in the past. (May
have – I don’t really know and I’m just guessing.) But with increased population and water
customers, the benefit from land sales decreases. Things change. Unfortunately
our trustee has not – a trustee you will remember who will tell you straight to
your face such things as a piece of property being “natural open space” when that
land is nothing more than a vacant lot in the middle of a long-established
neighborhood. (What do you do with your
trustee? Take your assets elsewhere. Fire your trustee. Go get a new one.)
It’s becoming clear. People want to preserve land not sell
it for development and subsidize developers. People want to re-vitalize our
downtown. People no longer believe tall tales about land sales and water rates.
Here’s another 10
reasons why protecting El Paso’s Scenic Transmountain Corridor is important
to protecting the Franklin Mountains State Park.
2 more things before we go:
Come hear wildlife and conservation biologist, John Sproul, this
coming Thursday, February 2nd, at 6 p.m. at the El Paso Garden
Center, 3105 Grant Avenue. (Map)
The Trans-Pecos Chapter of the Texas Master Naturalists is sponsoring this
presentation open to the public. Many of
you know that the Rio Bosque, an important ecological treasure and wildlife
habitat, is in critical danger. The drought, challenges with water, and
underfunding from the City have led to a park on the verge
of dying. Sproul and a handful of
volunteers daily truck water from the nearby Bustamante Plant into the park
where they hand water the trees. Bottom line: come hear Sproul.
By the way, elpasonaturally likes what the El Paso Times
editorial board had to say about wetlands in their op-ed
piece on work at the Fred Hervey Water Reclamation Plant in Northeast
El Paso. All the same arguments can be made for the endangered Rio Bosque
Wetlands Park, another City Park that the Parks and Recreation Department
spends zero dollars for – but then they haven’t budgeted for trails,
connectivity or open space.
Finally, as many of you know, an item to take action on the
City’s Comprehensive Plan Re-Write (Plan
El Paso) was deleted from last week’s CPC meeting. It seems that some at
the Chamber of Commerce want more time to give additional feedback. This is a euphemism for a delay tactic to
scuttle the plan. This Plan has been vetted for nearly two years now. (You can
read the complete draft of volume
1 and volume
2 of the Plan El Paso document online.)
More than 2500 people participated in 100 meetings and 20
hands-on-sessions. Plan El Paso has been discussed by numerous groups,
stakeholders and the press. Nobody can say that we can’t make a decision on it
now. As citizens who care, mark your calendars now and be heard at the
following upcoming meetings:
Comprehensive Plan Advisory
Committee
Monday, February 20, 2012, 10 a.m.
to Noon, 10th Floor City Hall
City Plan Commission
Thursday, February 20, 2012, 1:30
p.m., 2nd Floor City Hall
Legislative Review Committee
Thursday, February 23, 2012, 1:30
p.m., 2nd Floor City Hall
City Council
Tuesday, March 6, 2012, 8:30 a.m.,
2nd Floor City Hall
You can bet that the Chamber and those forces who hate the new
landscape ordinance, hate open space, hate the Open Space Advisory Board, hate
anything but concrete, asphalt, sprawl and water meters will be present at each
meeting. (See above about subsidizing developers.) City government needs to see
and hear us as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment