Sad to report that effluent from the Water Improvement
District to the Rio Bosque has stopped.
Not only that but in spite of the water district’s finally
allowing the transfer of water rights to the Bosque by private landowners,
there are apparently still some hold-ups. Charlie Wakeem chronicles his
attempts to transfer his water rights and I make some comments in a blog post: When a Water Right Isn’t a Water Right. El Paso Water
Improvement District General Manager Chuy Reyes visited Senator Rodriguez’s
Environmental Committee and answered their questions last week. I was in
attendance. Here’s the bottom line: The Board of the Water District
should give Mr. Reyes a raise. He is discharging his fiduciary responsibility
by serving his customers – those small tract owners and large farmers who pay
to have their land irrigated. Given the drought, every drop is dedicated
and directed toward paying customers. Thus, the Bosque is not going to get any
more water even after a turnout is constructed by the water district from the
canal into the Bosque. The Rio Bosque Wetlands Park may get water in wet
years to come – but not now. Moreover, people with water rights will
discover that they won’t be successful giving their water to the Bosque.
If they aren’t going to use it, then the paying customers are first in
line. This means that the only way that the Bosque can be guaranteed a
regular supply of water is for the EPWU (which now holds the Bosque in its
inventory of land) to deliver the water directly from the Bustamante plant by
constructing a nearly half-million dollar pipeline – chump change really.
EPWU dumps water from the plant into the District’s waterway because it
is obligated to give so much water back to the District and because it cannot
now deal with some of its excess. That excess (if it is treated) can go to the
Bosque. The water district will lose it – but then they could have given some
of that free water to the Bosque just as effluent.
There is now even some question whether the Bosque has
already received the acre feet of water from EPWU that was agreed upon.
Because of this uncertainty, new PSB Chairman Richard Schoephoerster does
not want to put construction of the new pipeline on the agenda. In my
opinion, the PSB may be losing sight of the reason for the water and why it
assumed the park into its inventory from the City: saving the Rio Bosque and
turning it into the $18 Million eco-tourist attraction that it can become not
to mention its value as a research center. What needs to happen is a
selection of a Bosque Planning Committee that can define a vision for the area
and set a business plan. Environmentalist, Judy Ackerman, says:
"It is well documented that the excess of 7,000 acre
feet per season of effluent from the Bustamante belongs to EPWU. PSB
currently has two choices. You can give that water away for FREE to
Hudspeth County OR you can use it to recharge our own aquifer for a long term
sustainable solution for the water needs or your customers. Keeping your
water on your land has multiple additional benefits such as scientific research
opportunities, a world class wetlands park on an international boarder in an
economically struggling area, and many more benefits."
Someone needs to begin asking why EPWU and Water District
policies seem to favor Hudspeth farmers with their full reservoirs.
One more thought. Farmers around here raise some pretty
water intensive crops: cotton and pecans come to mind. Both crops are far
more profitable than other crops that require less water. So for the gain
of immediate profit and personal enrichment, some farmers in our area will
impoverish future generations of water. Here’s the thought: perhaps water
districts by law should have to go to a tiered system
of billing just as the EPWU does with you and me. If I use a little bit
of water, I buy it at a pretty good rate. If I leap into the next tier of
water use, then my rate more than doubles. Water conservation would be
encouraged. Remember the Iroquois maxim: “In our every deliberation, we
must consider the impact of our decisions on the next seven generations.”
This beats the heck out of that slogan that says that “he who dies with
the most toys wins.”
I have said just about all that I can say about the ASARCO
stacks. You can read my final (probably, maybe penultimate) blog post for now. I have spoken with environmental
engineers who tell me that the $50 Million for clean-up was a fraction of what
was really needed. One of them told me that there is no way that even a
sprinkler can keep dust from spreading when the concrete stacks are brought
down and hit the ground at a high impact speed. What plans are there for
mitigating UTEP, Kern Place, Anapra, Juarez, etc. after the impact lifts dust
into the air? Bottom line from engineers: heavy metals have leeched into
the ground and will make their way to the river. The material used to
encapsulate contaminated materials in the Parker Brothers Arroyo will give way
eventually - perhaps as early as 20 years. Expert environmental engineers
advise that we must be vigilant about monitoring for generations to come. Some
places on the Asarco site (not all and not the majority of the area) must never
be built upon.
Please sign the Complete Streets Petition. A complete
street “will accommodate all road users, regardless of age, ability, or mode of
transportation. Complete streets might include sidewalks, bike lanes,
cycle tracks, wide paved shoulders, special bus lanes, comfortable and
accessible transit stops, frequent crossing opportunities, median islands,
accessible pedestrian signals, or curb extensions.” Get
information and sign the petition. Scroll down the page; there are
links to much more information. Bike Texas has complete streets as part of their
legislative agenda which also includes safe passing and a ban on texting while
driving.
And while we are on the subject of Bike Texas, be sure to
read an article by our own Beth Nobles, Executive Director of Texas Mountain Trail.
She writes about a way to earn dollars for a favorite charity through a new
iPhone or Android app called Charity Miles. The program is for walkers, runners and
bikers. Beth is also the oomph behind Peak Fitness Challenge along with Don
Baumgardt of GeoBetty.
Keeping El Paso naturally means keeping our Trans-Pecos/Southwestern New
Mexico region naturally and fit as well. (And charitable.)
For great hikes and events just check out El Paso Hiking
Group, GeoBetty, Guadalupe Mountains National Park Meetup Group, Las Cruces & El Paso Adventurists, Peak Fitness Challenge,
High
Desert Hikers and Las Cruces Hiking Meetup.
If you want a recreational and educational excursion in the
El Paso/Las Cruces area, sign up for one of the Back by Noon events sponsored by the Southwest Environmental
Center. See a Back by Noon poster.
Congratulations to El Paso Zoo Education Curator, Rick
LoBello, this year's recipient of the annual El Paso Trans Pecos Audubon
Society Conservation Award.
By the way, join the Auduboners on a field trip this
Saturday, Feb. 23, to the Holloman Lakes and Dog Canyon. You'll drive
north on US 54 about 1-1/2 hours to Alamogordo, then US 70 to the Holloman
Lakes. This area in an Important bird area. Then picnic and bird at
Oliver Lee State Park. There is a fee of $5 per vehicle. After
lunch the group plans to take a short hike up Dog Canyon. Meet at Lowe's
Parking Lot, 4531 Transmountain Road behind Taco Bell at 7:00 a.m.
Bring lunch, binoculars, water and a scope if you have one.
Beginners and nonmembers are welcome. Contact Mark Perkins at
637-3521 for more information.
Check out the Permaculture Workshop this Saturday at the Memorial Park
Garden Center.
Not just a coffee table book – Cacti of Texas
by El Pasoans, Gertrude and Ad Konings, should be in the library of every
Chihuahuan Desert recreationalist.
Finally and sadly we note the passing of Kathy Goodell, the
wife of Dr. Phil Goodell. Read her obituary. You will recall that the Goodells recently gave $1 Million to UTEP’s College of Science for a center
of entrepreneurial geosciences.
No comments:
Post a Comment